In a heated exchange that has sent shockwaves through the hip-hop community, Wack100 launched a blistering attack on DJ Akademiks, accusing him of engaging in “police work” by discussing sensitive street situations online. The confrontation escalated during a live stream when Wack criticized Akademiks for dissecting ongoing legal cases, including those involving Brick Baby and Big U. Tensions flared as Akademiks countered, pointing out Wack’s own contradictory behavior, asserting that both men are guilty of the same alleged infractions in their discussions.

Wack, known for his provocative statements, insisted he is not a “babysitter” and dismissed accusations that he instigated conflict between Loose Cannon and Big U. However, Akademiks fired back, highlighting Wack’s role in escalating the drama, calling out the hypocrisy in his claims of merely discussing paperwork while actively instigating situations that could lead to serious legal repercussions.

This explosive back-and-forth has ignited a firestorm online, with fans and critics alike weighing in on the ethics of discussing ongoing criminal cases as entertainment. The implications are particularly concerning, as legal experts point out that the content of their discussions could potentially be used against individuals in court. As Wack and Akademiks continue to spar, the stakes have never been higher, raising questions about the responsibilities of influencers in the digital age.

With both figures refusing to back down, this clash is poised to impact their careers and the broader conversation around crime, culture, and accountability in social media. Stay tuned for updates as this story unfolds, because in the world of hip-hop and online commentary, nothing is ever truly settled.